Connect with us

Defence & Security

Absence of judge stalls arraignment of ex-NIA D-G, wife over alleged $205m fraud – Seniora Post

Published

on

The absence of Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of a Federal High Court in Lagos, Monday, stalled the arraignment of former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), Amb. Ayo Oke and his wife Folashade, over 205 million dollars crime concealment.

The defendants are charged before Justice Aneke by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on counts of Money Laundering, fraud, concealment of crime proceeds, and criminal breech of trust.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the case which was earlier billed for arraignment of the defendants, was on Monday, further adjourned to a date that will be communicated to parties, as the court did not sit.

The judge is said to away on an of official assignment.

On Feb. 7, the court had issued a bench warrant for the arrest and production in court of the defendants, following an application moved by the prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo.

READ ALSO:   30 houses razed, 10 killed in fresh Kaduna violence - Seniora Post

According to the charge, on April 12, 2017, the accused indirectly concealed the sum of 43.5 million dollars, property of the Federal Government of Nigeria in Flat 7B, No. 16, Osborne Road, Osborne Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos.

The accused were also alleged to have between Aug. 25, 2015 and Sept. 2, 2015 in Lagos, indirectly used the sum of 1.7 million dollars, property of the Federal Government of Nigeria to acquire Flat 7B, No. 16, Osborne Road, Osborne Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos.

The prosecution also alleged that the defendant directly converted the sum of 160.8 million dollars property of the Federal Government of Nigeria, to their own use .

READ ALSO:   Banditry: Police inaugurate operation PUFF ADDER in Sokoto

The prosecution said that the defendant reasonably ought to have known that the said sums formed part of the proceeds of an unlawful act of criminal breach of trust and concealment of crime proceeds.

The offence, the EFCC said, contravened the provisions of sections 15, 15 (2), 15(2)(d) and 15 (3) of the Money laundering prohibition Act, 2015. (NAN)

Advertisement
Click to comment

Write Your Comment

Copyright © 2019 SENIORA NEWS seniorapost.com. All rights reserved.

You cannot copy content of this page